De Oratore Figurative
Reading
Cicero’s De Oratore, translates to On the Orator or On the Ideal Orator, and serves as a description of what he
imagines to be the perfect or ideal orator. In a time when the state was in
disarray, a figure was needed to take control and lead the people out of the
proverbial wild. While traditional power and persuasion at the time came from
military strength and weaponry, Cicero describes a different type of power, one
that comes from persuasion. The weapon described: eloquence.
In
describing the ideal orator, Cicero describes the power that such a speaker
would have. This power, he says, is able, “to raise up those that are cast
down, to bestow security, to set free from peril, to maintain men in their
civil rights”(32). These possibilities are ones that seem as though they would
come not from speaking, but from physical action or physical force. They are
possible in this case, because Cicero describes this eloquence as a weapon. The
skills that come with it, he says, are, “weapons wherein you can defend
yourself, or challenge the wicked man, or when provoked take your
revenge”(32).” In an attempt to sway his own listeners into believing the
immense power that spoken word can have, Cicero turns speech into action,
convincing his audience of the great importance of this figure. By using the
metaphor of persuasive powers being “weapons,” he gives physical power to what
otherwise would be intangible.
Physical
power, especially in the time of Cicero’s writing, most often came from an army
or from a soldier. But Cicero is describing the same power that would be
produced from a soldier stepping up to take control, but he speaks of an
orator, a public speaker. This tangibility of power gives the orator much more
persuasion than he would otherwise have. Persuasion comes not from just being
convinced of an argument, as it would if you were just listening to normal
speech, but from force of a weapon. Force of a weapon implies a threat, and potentially
a life-threatening situation. That is an incredible amount of power being
bestowed upon speech.
With this
weapon the orator has the ability to, “challenge the wicked man.” To do such a
thing the wicked man must first be discerned, meaning that the orator, armed
with these physical capabilities can discern right from wrong, and good from bad.
In challenging the wicked man, it becomes the orators duty to, “uphold the
safety of countless individuals and of the entire state”(34). Physical power from
spoken word given the ability to uphold the safety of an entire state is only
possible when spoken word takes on a physical form. From the metaphor of
eloquence as this weapon, spoken word takes this form.
With this
weapon, the orator would be able to take command of the state, leading them to
safety and greatness. Eloquence, writes Cicero, is the only power, “strong
enough either to gather scattered humanity into one place, or lead it out of
its brutish existence in the wilderness”(33). In these few lines, eloquence’s
persuasion and power has now turned from simple speech, to a powerful weapon,
and now it is the only weapon powerful enough to create civilization. It
discerns humanity from the beasts, shaping states, laws, and cultures.
Eloquence has the ability to not only protect the state but create it from the
mess of the wilderness.
Cicero’s
own eloquence speaks to the power that speech has. Without his words, this
power would not be bestowed upon the orator, and he would not be able to uphold
the safety of an entire state. The physical power from the metaphor serves to
strengthen it further, acting as its own argument of eloquence’s power. Cicero
takes speech, and from it creates a power that builds states, separates man
from beast, fights off enemies, and seeks revenge. Without this figure,
eloquence would be an intangible power, based on conviction alone. The
argumentative power that this figure holds comes from the tangibility that
Cicero gives it when it is equated to a weapon. Physical force and physical strength
turn this figure into a power greater than any army, creating, defending, and
upholding the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment