Linda Olmos
The Apology by Plato
Jerilyn
Sambrooke
Creating a plot
twist, Socrates responds to what is considered his punishment by the jury. The
punishment is his death sentence. Rather than perceiving death as something
dire, Socrates unfolds the Socratic
Paradox, which ironically is not a punishment but the opposite of a grim
verdict. Rather, the death sentence offers promising future: “Let us reflect in
another way, and we shall see that there is great reason to hope that death is
good, for one of two things: -either death is a state of nothingness and utter
unconsciousness, or as men say, there is a change and migration of the soul
from this world to another.”
As we can
observe from the passage, Socrates is neither afraid of nor unhappy about death
because he is arguing that if death is a deep sleep, then it is a painless and
peaceful rest. Socrates finds this “utter unconsciousness,” symbolizing death,
to be inviting. From Socrates’s perspective, life is full of pain and because
death is “unconsciousness,” it is free of pain, a concept different from the dreadful
fear that many people today have of death. If death is the journey to his
afterlife, Socrates reasons, what is there to fear? This afterlife, Socrates
contends is “nothingness.” We have to ask ourselves, what is there to feel or
fear in “nothingness?” Furthermore, in
the “migration of the soul from this world to another,” Socrates himself has
nothing to dread because his “soul” will certainly not be migrating to another
world such as hell.
In Socrates’
Paradox, knowledge consequently is valued as good because ignorance is
considered evil. This means God is good. As stated from the beginning of the
plot, Socrates does not lack ignorance. Socrates is knowledgeable because he
admits that he knows nothing. Because Socrates is knowledgeable, he is good,
not evil. Socrates leads us to conclude that he
“migration of the soul from this world to another” for someone good can only be
positive.
In reality,
Socrates is content with this option because in afterlife, he can converse with
heroes of the past, such as Palamedes and Ajax; Socrates further argues that
afterlife is not be feared because there, he can look for true and false
knowledge and differentiate between the wise and unwise just as he does on
earth. This is his passion.
Socrates is put
on trial for expressing his ideas freely and thereby receives a death sentence due
to his passion for truth and knowledge. What makes the passage being analyzed
particularly ironic is that Socrates successfully asserts that his sentence,
rather than representing a bleak castigation, is a reward. This is the opposite of what Socrates’s
jurors intended. In short, although
Socrates is sentenced to death, and all seems hopeless, he is the real winner. He uses his intelligence and integrity to
stand up to the jury of his time.
No comments:
Post a Comment